AIG Employee Reviews for Anonymous Employee

"AIG is a mediocre company for which to work and has an out-of-date technology stack. While it has good benefits such as a fantastic 401k plan with matching, it does not foster happiness, personal, or professional growth."

"Worked there 5 years. Flexible work schedule and good benefits. Good salary. BUT- raises are done in secret for friends only. There's no incentive or evaluation to get one. Promotions are based on favoritism or "likability." Doesn't matter if the person has no experience and no degree, if he/she is related to the boss. ABSOLUTELY NO DIVERSITY! If you speak Spanish you won't get hired. If you're a person of color you won't get promoted. If you go, don't stay more than a year. There's no training, but you'll figure it out."

"I worked at AIG for a total of almost ten years. They laid me off December 5, 2016, so 20 days before Christmas. Who does that? Just shows you how companies care nothing about employees but only their bottom line."

"I worked at AIG for 9 years. It was a fun and exciting company to work for."

"I've worked for this company for over 4 years."

"Horribly underpaid position. No way to advance. Career path advancement is pure propaganda . Many people in higher level jobs either lack training or should I just say, incompetent? No raise in 3 years. Their scheme is called STI's for short term incentives. That way you get a small bonus if you made high production and no raise if you don't make it the next year. Bonus never figures out to be worth it since you get it in one chunk, the taxes wipe it out! Lousy place to work. Avoid."

"I've worked for AIG AEROSPACE since 2007, they have many layoffs a year and expect employees to work without raises."

"Great place, better people."

"I've worked for AIG since 2011. It's a great place to learn about the business and contribute my own ideas. AIG is great because I wanted a new career with global opportunities, and I wanted to make a difference to an organization and the community."

"I've been here for over 20 years. No salary increase in 5 years and a forced ranking system for evaluating performance is grossly flawed. I've participated in many performance round tables and know rankings are subjective and based very little on performance but instead are based on the likability of workers. Grading is determined by a distribution bell curve. 20% of employees must be rated a 4 (under performer). If there are no under performers they still have to force 20% to be 4's."