LMI Government Consulting Employee Reviews for Anonymous Employee

"The company is good. It suffers from change management pains. The benefits are the best part, their implementation on job/role mobility is not good."

"I have worked at LMI since 2017. They have always been not afraid to innovate and think outside the box which I love. Moreover, they give their employees all the resources, training, and support to succeed."

"LMI is the most broad-minded employer for whom I have ever worked."

"Works with the government in a wide range of fields. Has understanding, flexible people who help to develop various skill sets and can find work in numerous fields across the country."

"LMI is a great company and awards dynamic job professionalism/expertise with great compensation and bonuses"

"Good staff. Current work environment is good. In the past, LMI benefits package was once one of the best, but has been under constant cost cutting since about 2009. Current office building provides for private offices, but that will change when LMI moves into its new building and the staff will work from cubicles or open work stations. Having told us how great that will be for collaboration, if only the CEO would follow the example of Meg Whitman or Jeff Zuckerberg and put himself into a cubicle, that would send a strong message. CEO attempts to impress the Board are leading to the company looking good in the short term by cutting costs, even as the long-term prospects are increasingly at risk by his actions. Salary increases for the older staff have been significantly below national averages (as reported by CNN). This has been painfully true for even "top performers." In July 2013 the CEO sent an email to the entire company announcing a benefits survey, saying that despite benefit cuts already made more would be coming. At a June 2014 "town hall" meeting he announced that "grey hairs" don't have a future at LMI. Sounded like "age discrimination" to many. CEO is chasing the Booz Allen model, but the core strength of LMI has been its experienced senior staff. Salary increases below market average, reduction of benefits, loss of private offices, and telling older workers that they are not welcome will eventually lead to a recruiting and retention problem. Board members need to take note of the long-term damage being done to the company."

"Wouldn't work there again."